Back to latest news

Interpreting Latvia’s 27% figure requires a precise denominator

The evaluation’s estimate should remain attributed.

Your learning

Loading your learning…

Health news editorial illustration for Latvia Alcohol Rules Show Early Health Gains

Beginner support · Translation help

Read with help in your language

Choose a language to see each paragraph translated below the English. Tap highlighted words for a quick meaning.

the of , – 2025.

It a 27% in from to and an of more 60 .

The that and , or . It an , not a or by this .

Sources checked 26 October 2026.

Read · Think · Practise

Try this story

Try 2 questions about this story, then explain one idea in your own words. Check the text whenever you need to.

In this lesson: Evaluate the scope and attribution of an early policy result.

Print a worksheet · Teacher guide & answers

Read and understand · 1/2Which broader category must not replace the reported one?

Read the answer and explanation

All-cause mortality. The third paragraph explicitly distinguishes the finding from all-cause mortality.

Clue: The result concerns that defined category and window, rather than all-cause mortality or every alcohol-associated death. It should remain an attributed evaluation result, not a universal or permanent effect established by this article.

Read and understand · 2/2How should the result be presented?

Read the answer and explanation

As WHO’s attributed evaluation for a defined period. The third paragraph limits the claim to the attributed evaluation and its window.

Clue: The result concerns that defined category and window, rather than all-cause mortality or every alcohol-associated death. It should remain an attributed evaluation result, not a universal or permanent effect established by this article.

Grammar in this story: An estimate with of

an estimate of more than 60 deaths averted

Of links estimate to the quantity being estimated. More than gives a lower bound, and averted is a passive participle meaning prevented.

Your turn

Explain why both attribution and the evaluation window should remain in a summary.

See one possible answer

They identify whose analysis produced the result and the period it covers. Removing them could turn an early, bounded finding into an unsupported claim about every future period.

Your answer can be different. Give a reason and use your own words.

0 of 2 questions checked.

Tell us what helped or felt difficult

Which reading level did you try? Was a sentence unclear? Did the questions help you understand the story?

Send feedback by email

Your three-minute English break

A little English in your inbox.

One short story, one useful phrase, one quick question. Free, up to twice a week.