News by Levels · Level 3 · Student worksheet

The storm account separates tracks from consequences

In this lesson: Separate geographical position from consequences and preserve the time boundary.

Name: __________________________ Date: __________________

Read the story

NASA’s September account contrasted Polo’s crossings of Baja California and mainland Mexico with Nolo’s passage near Hawaii without landfall.

Nolo’s rainfall still produced reported flooding and landslides. NASA supported disaster response through mapping and data products.

The distinction is geographical versus consequential: landfall concerns the storm’s track, while effects can extend beyond it. Readers should also retain the report’s historical date rather than treating an archived event summary as present-day warning information.

Editorial correction, 26 October 2026: We corrected factual wording and chronology after checking the sources below. This is a retrospective archive review; the original publication date is retained.

Source: Sources checked 26 October 2026. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/powerful-storms-continue-to-prowl-the-pacific/ https://appliedsciences.nasa.gov/what-we-do/disasters

Read and practise

1. What does “consequential” refer to in the contrast?

   1. Only the path of its centre
   2. The report’s publication format
   3. The storm’s effects

2. Which use would overextend the archived account?

   1. Treating it as present-day warning information
   2. Comparing the two September tracks
   3. Reporting NASA’s mapping support at that time

Your turn

Summarise both the geographical distinction and the limit on using the report later.

________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________

Read online: https://newsbylevels.com/news/pacific-storms-flood-landslide-risks-september-2026/level-3/