News by Levels · Level 3 · Student worksheet

Interpreting Latvia’s 27% figure requires a precise denominator

In this lesson: Evaluate the scope and attribution of an early policy result.

Name: __________________________ Date: __________________

Read the story

WHO’s September report assessed the first five implementation months of Latvia’s alcohol-policy changes, covering August–December 2025.

It reported a 27% decline in deaths from causes wholly attributable to alcohol and an estimate of more than 60 deaths averted.

The result concerns that defined category and window, rather than all-cause mortality or every alcohol-associated death. It should remain an attributed evaluation result, not a universal or permanent effect established by this article.

Editorial correction, 26 October 2026: We corrected factual wording and chronology after checking the sources below. This is a retrospective archive review; the original publication date is retained.

Source: Sources checked 26 October 2026. https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/28-09-2026-new-alcohol-policy-measures-in-latvia-produce-rapid-public-health-gains https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/alcohol

Read and practise

1. Which broader category must not replace the reported one?

   1. Deaths in the defined evaluation category
   2. All-cause mortality
   3. Wholly alcohol-attributable deaths

2. How should the result be presented?

   1. As WHO’s attributed evaluation for a defined period
   2. As a permanent universal effect in every population
   3. As a count of every alcohol-associated death

Your turn

Explain why both attribution and the evaluation window should remain in a summary.

________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________

Read online: https://newsbylevels.com/news/latvia-alcohol-rules-early-health-gains-september-2026/level-3/