News by Levels · Level 3 · For teachers

Teacher guide & answers

In this lesson: Distinguish an attributed preliminary concern from a confirmed violation.

PayPal Assessment Separates a Concern From a Finding

How to use these two pages

Give learners the student worksheet. It contains the story and questions, without the answers. Keep this guide for yourself. Use it to lead the activity and explain the answers afterwards.

Student worksheet

A simple 15–20-minute lesson

  1. Before reading · 2 minutes

    Show the title. Ask: “What do you think this story is about?”

  2. Read and answer · 8–10 minutes

    Give out the student worksheet. Learners read for the main idea, then reread to answer the 2 questions. They can compare answers with a partner.

  3. Discuss and write · 5–8 minutes

    Check the answers below together. Ask learners to point to the clue in the story, then finish with the open question.

Adjust the support: Let learners use word help or Level 1 if needed. For a challenge, compare the wording in another level. This activity is not a proficiency test.

Answers to the 2 questions

The question numbers match the student worksheet. Each answer includes a reason and the clue learners can find in the story.

  1. Who says the rule could impede competing providers?

    Correct answer: C — The Bundeskartellamt

    Why: The first paragraph attributes the possible effect to the Bundeskartellamt.

    Clue in the story: The Bundeskartellamt issued a preliminary assessment of PayPal’s restriction on merchants charging customers separately for its payment service. It says the rule could impede competing providers.

  2. Why is a confirmed violation not established?

    Correct answer: B — The assessment is preliminary and PayPal can respond

    Why: The second paragraph explains the response opportunity and limits of a preliminary concern.

    Clue in the story: PayPal has an opportunity to respond before a final decision. A preliminary concern does not establish a confirmed competition-law violation.

The open question: accept different answers

Ask learners: Summarise the assessment without presenting an allegation as a final finding.

One possible answer: The Bundeskartellamt says PayPal’s restriction could impede competing providers. Its assessment is preliminary, and PayPal can respond before a final decision; a confirmed violation has not been established.

This is an example, not the only correct answer. Look for a relevant idea, a reason and the learner’s own words. Learners can answer aloud or write one or two sentences.

Grammar to discuss

An opportunity before a decision

before a final decision

Before locates PayPal’s response opportunity ahead of the final outcome.

Your three-minute English break

A little English in your inbox.

One short story, one useful phrase, one quick question. Free, up to twice a week.